Something got on Orkut not long ago ... (This time at least I can not screw up the writing, and it's all copy & paste)
`
Since the above post can be confusing and I can find things they call me I'm not, I will clarify things.
Of course, these questions should answer them all to enter this community would be valuable.
- Do I believe in democracy?
Of course I believe in democracy (full), but the democratic process is like a news reader: the more information and less free publicity the better. Lately the democratic process is nothing more than a source of misinformation and advertising.
- What is my ideology? For
is not noticed, my ideology is in constant training from two outbreaks: anarchism and communism (ie anarcho-syndicalism). Lifetime close to PCE, I have always questioned their appearance based rancid doctrines that say not doctrines but methods that have never been implemented. However, evil is the best.
-On Regional Conflict of Independence or self-determination of a national or company.
completely agree with the determination of companies, provided they are based on democracy and some form of identity, both geographical and anthropological. Normally neither government nor pro-independence leaders tend to favor a democratic solution, so another thing that has never been implemented.
-Terrorism regard independence.
Completely against.
-Al on Global Terrorism. Fully
against, but is the result of a war begun by the West we are part of (a war that Muslims respond with what they call Jihad, which I thought was a character Manolito Gafotas)
-regard Western society. Corrupt
, undone, dehumanized, contradictory, discriminatory, unrealistic, poorly educated ... In two words: shit, and if we talk about the U.S. ... better not talk about the U.S..
-preferred candidate in the U.S. (as a major world power).
Ralph Nader.
-Bid
favorite in Spain.
Izquierda Unida.
This is constructive, so I am therefore more things clearer, and I like (I'm asking) that you, if you will, ye answer the same points and añadais which you seem necessary.
-Aspirations for Politics.
just trying to understand the policy (I used to try, if it would be the milk).
-Attitudes
crisis.
Pacifism, negotiation and debate.
-political aspirations (which is not the same as above, and also what you can call "utopian aspirations"). Fighting
(through democratic mechanisms) for the exaltation of human freedom over freedom material. In the first instance, resume social freedom to pick up my question and then enjoy it as an individual.
-Doctrine or philosophical theory. Rational-Vitalism
post-Socialist. The Rational Vitalism is the reconciliation between the rational theories (from Socrates to Kant) and Vitality (Schopenhaver and Nietzsche) by Jose Ortega y Gasset, the aristocratic political ideology (Plato). However, the political ideology in my case is the post-socialist or anarcho-communism (I say very bad happen in a revolutionary process in which everything is confusion about the future, I call Socialist period, and therefore prefer post-socialism, which is what comes next, although clear, first you must pass the bridge to get to the other side). Also add that I have accepted the concept of anarchism in the communist society, according to which the community aspires to the federal union and anarchism to the separation of the federation. The land of a federation are used (for the most part, the Iberian peninsula belongs to Spain without being a large part of their land used).
Utopia is on the horizon. Walk two steps, it is two steps away. I walk ten steps and the horizon runs ten steps further. "So what is it Utopia?, For that, to walk. (Eduardo Galeano)
Indeed Utopia is an online game: P
'
0 comments:
Post a Comment