few days ago I got my hands (well, my screen) a text written by Antonio Escohotado, Professor of Philosophy, which surprised me. This text discusses various issues related to the Arab world, and you could say that directly strike the central district of Lavapies of dispossession (literally intends to apply the saying 'He hates eating bread and shit in the bag' with the neighborhood), before attempting to this area as little more than focus of Islamic terrorism.
This text, at least from my point of view, it is ironic and therefore funny throughout. He speaks of Human Rights signed in 1948 by the United Nations and said that if any country does not provide such a declaration, it goes to the UN. That has given him, because I still remember that article number 3 makes clear that 'Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. " Even with that, goes on to say that the Western anti-Americanism (European, of which we see that NATO is a killing machine and therefore, like guns, do not like) is, to put it in some way and to summarize the words of this man, a sense of ingratitude, since the U.S. helped rebuild Europe after the Second World War and bla bla bla ... and indeed, without U.S. aid, would all be under a dictatorship of the Third Reich or not under a despotic regime-social (as I say in my own way, but as others curse 'Socialist Regime'), as was that of Stalin.
The truth is that history speaks for itself, and as anyone who talks, can be misunderstood, or just part of the speech can be heard. The part of speech they hear, hear not only what they want, apparently.
However, depending on the version of this man, we have much to owe to Japan then to attack U.S. and push the country to declare war on the Nipponese, after which came the German declaration of war against the United States. Best Moreover, as we honor the memory of Hitler for being so catastrophically clumsy and declare war on the U.S..
not get me wrong, I say 'catastrophically stupid' because I think it was an unfortunate event, much less, but if I say awkward because it was catastrophically wrong for himself, and something that we are still paying as part of some kind of debt U.S. historical.
However, I think it was the Russians and not the Americans who came first in Berlin ... Alo's best to hear what I want, like this man.
The truth is that this man blames the Muslims almost everything: from racism, sexism, of despotism, terrorism, fundamentalism, violate the Declaration of Human Rights ... As I said, it is ironic to criticize what you have at home, but looking at the neighbor. And so we in the West, we see only the mote in your neighbor's eye, for all that and more, we have only in the U.S., and especially in the Southern States (as usual), where they come from Bush, there where there is more corruption (being told Bush to Florida), and where there are more states with death penalty (Arizona, Alabama, Utah, New Mexico, Florida, Texas, South Carolina, Louisiana, Kansas ...) . With this description for me it would be anti-American as the rest of covering these states and over claim to respect human rights. Refrain from talking about the Kyoto treaty, and how well it meets the Geneva Conventions at Guantanamo Bay ... What more civilized civilization, give thanks for many quench their thirst for death in the Second World War.
Best of all is that in Spain we are not supposed to Europe for the U.S.. So much so that, being a Fascist dictatorship in Spain in 1945, just arrived in the Pyrenees and then down, extra-European territory, because the dictatorship of 1945, continued even in 1950, and even in 1970. Moreover, as good Americans were thinking of the people and freedom, supported fascist dictatorships from the 50's. On top we have to thank them for free from Nazism and Fascism?, If they did ... Anyway
no sincere and acceptable criticism than a good friend, as I said a few days ago the former White House aide, referring to criticism of France to the United States to undertake the negociete Iraq, but Friends criticism was not heard, and of course, friends became 'apestaos'. He even changed the name of French fries in the U.S. because there are "French Potatoes."
Mr. this, however, continues talking about how bad the current Muslims who are fundamentalist extremists, so civilized than they were before the Crusades. There may have noticed that wars extreme positions of the people. He was in World War II, with both American and English patriotism and Nazi-Fascist so silly that even reached Japan. Where some put 'Territory Führer' others put 'Crown Land' and others put 'Land of Liberty' (it seems that this is the nickname of the U.S., as more appropriate than calling Socialist Stalin). And just as he was then, is being seen now. Islamic Fundamentalism, by chance, comes after the last cross in the thirteenth century, the result of Catholic fundamentalism that emerged from the sufferings of Jesus, the struggle against paganism, and so on. And that extremism, relaxed after many centuries, has resurfaced again after so many invasions and colonial war in Moslem territory.
If we have to thank the U.S., we have to be the England that is its founder, and if we have to give thanks to England, fault will be invaded and fought the colonial territory with other countries along eighteenth and nineteenth centuries because of these disputes arise Islamic Extremism, thanks to our wonderful civilization and its hard to do what comes out of the very.
But it did not stop in the colonization of these areas, no. Continued throughout the twentieth century and the end of World War I, of course, reminding more after World War II. And this time if that is the fault of the U.S. and the Soviet Union (although they deny that is part of our civilization), as they are, and not others, those who pushed the Islamists tightened up as much as they could, and so , the spoils of the Soviet attempts to invade Afghanistan, Taliban emerged gentlemen, and likewise, subsidizing the war between Iran and Iraq, the U.S. made that those territories were a tinderbox of Islamic fundamentalism and extremism. Islamic fundamentalism also emerged in Palestine, but to me did the same to the Palestinians, would be more libertarian than Che. Because Islamic fundamentalism is not the only one there, it is because he caught the fence, neither more nor less. But they could have been another type of fundamentalism if it were here, as Marxists or anarchists by the European left, or Fascists on the right. That sounds like something from 36 by the way ...
The funny thing is that the Islamic fundamentalism, which reminds me of a website called "'Presidential Prayer Team' (Equipo Presidential Prayer Makers / Speakers), where a well-funded by the 'White House' asks God to defend the Mr. Bush and be with him and pray for each week a different member of the American government. If that is not fundamentalism, which Javé raise the head (for dead this, as the philosopher said) and tell himself with his omnipotence what this is.
But let's review what this intelligent than man (something that no doubt, is a philosopher) accuses the Muslims between the lines: racism, sexism, tyranny, terrorism, fundamentalism, violate the Declaration of Human Rights. I have not seen any black U.S. president or a woman president, but also in the rest of the 'Western world'. Fundamentalism, the "PPT" and the Rouco Varela. Despotism, if, like the U.S. uses every time there is Security Council meeting of the UN to condemn the murders of the State of Israel, and as the JMAznar has shown that from 2000 to 2004. Terrorism, of course, as the assassination of Kennedy, Allende, torture in Iraq and the complicity of the murder Israelis against the Palestinian population. For violations of human rights ... Who is believed that the U.S. respects the rights?. If Muslims countries should not be in the UN for not respecting human rights, the U.S. should not be. But the greater the American crime: they are co-founders ... Things missing in our Western, something more than respect for self and neighbor.
0 comments:
Post a Comment